Overview
PRODUCT INTRODUCTION OF OUR FOAM FILLED FENDER
Performance
There are some reports of foam-filled fenders that absorb 40% more energy than pneumatic fenders.
However, performance of foam fenders really depends on the manufacturer. We have heard cases of customers using foam fenders that deformed easily during operation. Once deformed, the fender is not suitable for use any more. Not only the energy absorption is not efficient, it may even damage the vessels or dock.
Therefore, it is important to not blindly assume that all foam fenders are better in performance. It is better to check and order from a manufacturer with a strong track record of delivering great products.
At Jerryborg Marine, our foam fenders have been used for various projects globally in countries.
Maintenance
Both foam-filled fenders and pneumatic fenders require minimum maintenance. Regular inspection is a must for both fender types.
For pneumatic fenders, just add in the air addition regularly (probably around 12 months). Besides, both are low
maintenance equipment if you purchase from the right manufacturer. So in this area, it can be said the two are almost tied, with foam fender a slight edge over pneumatic.
Durability
Durability is harder to gauge. This is not an accurate benchmark as the conditions of deployment (working conditions) and usage rate is not taken into account.
However, one obvious advantage a foam-filled type has over a pneumatic rubber fender is that they do not deflate.
When pneumatic fenders got punctured, they fail to perform any more. Whereas for foam fenders, they would still be able to be deployed, albeit having much less efficient energy absorption.
){kind=link}